Did Jesus Ever Declare He Was The Messiah?

The answer? Yes, right at the start! Rev. Aaron Eime takes a look at the first words Jesus taught in the synagogue and explains how understanding the Hebrew linguistics is crucial for us to understand Jesus' direct claim to be the Messiah.

Shhh, don't tell anyone...

Perhaps one of the more frustrating things about the Gospels is that Jesus never seems to tell people He is the Messiah.

When people actually figure it out He often gives instructions to be quiet and not to tell anyone. Which, on the surface, seems incredibly self-defeating for your mission if your mission is to be the Messiah and for people to follow you as such.

Taking a closer look...

Looking closely at what is said

Linguistics is the scientific study of languages in three major aspects:

  1. Language form
  2. Language meaning
  3. Language context 

It is in the Hebraic context, the use of and meaning of the language of Jesus (Hebrew), that Jesus does indeed share His Messiahship and mission, and He does so at the beginning of His ministry - right at the start!

Jesus begins to teach

Luke 4 details the introduction to the ministry of Jesus, setting the scene in His hometown synagogue of Nazareth.

Jesus (Yeshua), obviously a trained Bible reader, is handed the Isaiah portion for the Haftorah reading from the Prophets. After reading from Isaiah 61 He delivers His first recorded teaching, a one line sermon.

Chapters and Verses were not introduced into the Biblical text until the 13th Century (for chapters) and 16th Century (for verses). In the English translation we can easily note that Yeshua, in reading Isaiah 61:1-2, does not finish the last sentence, drops a sentence from the text and even adds a sentence altogether.

If I stood up to read a portion from the Gospel of Matthew, and as I read I inserted some Psalms, a little bit of Pauline text and finished with a dose of Revelation, I might be asked to justify why I did not read the text as it was plainly written? What Jesus does though is perfectly applicable to His Jewish context and linguistic hermeneutic.

He is ‘allowed’ to do what He did, due to the way Hebrew language is constructed and how it is used and applied to Biblical interpretation during the 2nd Temple Period, the time of Jesus.

Remember, Jesus’ comment on this passage ‘Today, this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing’ (Luke 4:21).

The real question

The real question we should ask ourselves then is, what was fulfilled in the scripture?

The prophetic portion begins with רוּחַ אֲדֹנָי יֱהֹוִה עָלָי יַעַן מָשַׁח יְהֹוָה אֹתִי, ‘the Spirit of the Lord is on me’. Luke connects everything to the Spirit. Jesus is born of the Spirit, and now He is anointed by the Spirit, whereas Matthew focuses on the royalty of the Messiah.

Matthew has the visit of the Magi, the majestic gifts and the proclamation as King. Luke presents the poorer side of Jesus, with more details of the Messiah at a younger age. Now after coming out of the desert, having been sent there by the Spirit, Luke presents the ministry of Jesus beginning with the Spirit of God on Jesus.

Using Hebrew to connect the dots

Connecting the next portion of the sentence is the Hebrew word Ya’an, often translated as ‘because’.

The literal Hebrew word for ‘because’ is ‘Ki’ and doesn’t sound anything like ‘Ya’an’. ‘Ya’an’ comes from an old root word, and is not often used, meaning to pay attention, implying the purpose of something important to be heeded. It is used linguistically to stress the importance of what follows.

A modern day schoolteacher would make use of the word ‘Ya’an’ to inform the class that what follows in the instruction is fundamental and needs the class’ full attention.

What follows in the Isaiah passage is quite important, which is מָשַׁח יְהֹוָה אֹתִי. Literally the verb L’Mashiach means to anoint / make a Messiah / make an anointed one. The Messiah is indeed an anointed one. Our translations express this sentence as ‘God has anointed me.’

God has made me Messiah

All kings of Israel and some prophets were anointed. Each king is essentially a ‘little messiah’. However another way to say this in English is ‘God has made me Messiah’.

After Yeshua reads this portion He sits down and as all the eyes of the synagogue are on Him, He states, ‘Today this Scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing’. Jesus did say that He was the Messiah.

He was quite clear and He declared it right at the start!


Ready for further study?  Return to the Resources page.


Thank you for this teaching. Is Jesus' discussion with the Samarian woman in John 4 another clear declaration of His identity and, if so, what is His purpose in openly revealing himself to this woman at this point in time?

Christ explains that the messianic gift is spiritual.
The Jews were looking for a Anointed King to free them from the Romans.
In the past only Anointed king's could lead Israel into war.
Christ never proclaimed to be their King but came as Son of God.
The Jews were looking for the wrong person.
The son of God is above all king's

The woman said to Him, “I know that Messiah is coming” (who is called Christ). “When He comes, He will tell us all things.” Jesus said to her, “I who speak to you am He. ”
John 4:25‭-‬26 NKJV

In the past only Anointed king's could rule over and thereby have freed Israel.
Christ never said that he was their king, he said son of God and they never recognised him.

I find this very confusing I understand the New Testament is written in Greek not Hebrew and although Jesus undoubtedly spoke Hebrew the predominate language in Palestine at the time of Jesus was Aramaic, which is likely what he spoke to common people.

Due to Hellenism, Greek was the language of the world at the time, including the Jewish race which was very assimilated at the time. Even the Roman Empire continued to use Greek as the main language. Many Jews did not even speak Hebrew at the time. Aramaic was the language that Jesus spoke at the time.

Galilean Aramaic.
Maaloulan Aramaic Syrians still speaks some of this language.
He is known there in one name *ONLY*, "MSHIA" a.k.a Anointed.
Only Anointed king's could free Israel from bondage but seeing they didn't recognise the MSHIA as God's son, no king will arrive to deliver them.

He came to anoint us as God's son and not as king nor prophet.
The Jews are still looking for a deliverer as king.
Christ is above king's

Kind of a "click bait" situation here. The question is did he claim to be THE messiah. And the answer to that question is a resounding no. He was a Jew and he knew the precursors for the arrival of his religions messiah, and those events had not occurred. Sorry.

When he said to the woman at the well, " I am he"Was he not saying that he was the Messiah

Why was Jesus cautious and the verses few about his admission that He was a Messiah?
What was his goal?

He was the spiritual Messiah of peace.
Not the Messiah whom the Jews expected, who was meant to free them from Roman slavery.

He was cautious because calling oneself a messiah is dangerous at that time. It has a political implications. It is only applied to earthly and ambitious kings. In addition, the people of Israel were expecting God to send another messiah like David to annihilate their enemies. Jesus never claimed himself as a messiah in that sense because his way is not to take revenge against Roman empire but active non-violence. The reason why he reprimanded Peter who had misunderstood him. He never claimed this as a title but what we see in the gospel of Luke and Matthew as claimed by rev. Aaron is a post-resurrection confession. Luke 4: 16-20 is what in Luke’s understanding as Jesus’ program to build a humane kingdom here on earth where the weak and poor are given back their dignity.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.